Lightroom integrates well with Photoshop CS, if you have both pieces of software.You can extend Lightroom by buying plug-ins.You can use Lightroom for 16 bit Raw processing, then Photoshop Elements for stuff you can’t do in Lightroom such as using layers. Lightroom combined with Photoshop Elements gives you a relatively inexpensive but powerful image editing set-up.Here are more reasons for choosing Lightroom over Photoshop CS or another Raw converter: This is the same processing engine in a different guise. It’s only a small sample but it seems that most photographers (professionals at least) that are not using Lightroom are using Adobe Camera Raw in Photoshop. Of the Mac users, 44.4% used Lightroom and 12.5% used Aperture. The Wikipedia entry on Lightroom has this to say about market share:Īccording to 2009 statistics from research company InfoTrends, released by Adobe Systems product manager John Nack, of the 1,045 North American professional photographers who were interviewed, 37.0% used Lightroom and 6.3% used Aperture while 57.9% used the Photoshop Camera Raw plug-in. Why Lightroom 4, as opposed to other software? I’ve noticed that there is a lot of material being published about Lightroom, and not much about other software, which suggests Lightroom is popular. One of the questions that Digital Photo Professional (DPP) users may have is what are the benefits of moving to a more advanced Raw processor like Adobe Lightroom 4? This blog is no longer updated, but you can read my latest articles at my new website The Creative Photographer and find my photography ebooks at my new store.
MEGLIO LIGHTROOM OR EXPOSURE X ARCHIVE
You have reached the archive of articles posted on my personal blog.
0 kommentar(er)
